<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iterative Video Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timhowgego.com/iterative-video-development.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timhowgego.com/iterative-video-development.html</link>
	<description>Thoughts, Ideas, Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 05:16:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Howgego</title>
		<link>http://timhowgego.com/iterative-video-development.html#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Howgego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timhowgego.com/?p=144#comment-768</guid>
		<description>Objectives vary.

El is certainly a lot more professional now than &quot;she&quot; started out. And when given the opportunity, I tend towards perfection. Where perfection is judged relative to (that is, by) other people. It&#039;s not a surprise I ended up here.

It is still perplexing more people don&#039;t follow. For example, I see a lot of new &quot;tech&quot; businesses agonize over detailed business plans, only to have to reinvent themselves a few months into the project. Traditional industries with long lead-times and large numbers of employees have to work like that. But a lot of internet-based things do not. So as a broad approach, it has a lot of potential.

&#039;Blog iteration would still be possible, but rather than change individual posts, iterate within new content. Of course &#039;blogs tend to be more of a stream (or my case, trickle) of consciousness, where often the author is writing for themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Objectives vary.</p>
<p>El is certainly a lot more professional now than &#8220;she&#8221; started out. And when given the opportunity, I tend towards perfection. Where perfection is judged relative to (that is, by) other people. It&#8217;s not a surprise I ended up here.</p>
<p>It is still perplexing more people don&#8217;t follow. For example, I see a lot of new &#8220;tech&#8221; businesses agonize over detailed business plans, only to have to reinvent themselves a few months into the project. Traditional industries with long lead-times and large numbers of employees have to work like that. But a lot of internet-based things do not. So as a broad approach, it has a lot of potential.</p>
<p>&#8216;Blog iteration would still be possible, but rather than change individual posts, iterate within new content. Of course &#8216;blogs tend to be more of a stream (or my case, trickle) of consciousness, where often the author is writing for themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larísa</title>
		<link>http://timhowgego.com/iterative-video-development.html#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>Larísa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timhowgego.com/?p=144#comment-767</guid>
		<description>The question is of cause where your motivation lies. Everyone hasn&#039;t got a goal to reach and please the biggest audience possible. If you&#039;re making a commercial product you probably want to do that, but not necessarily if you&#039;re at an amateur level. While I think your approach is very interesting in my professional role (being into PR myself), I deliberately refrain from it while I&#039;m blogging my heart out at my wow blog just for the fun of it and as a relaxing way of spending my spare time. Yeah, I like the readers to be involved, I love to discuss with them in comments, but no way that I would bother to go back and change my blogposts following the feedback in their comments! I guess blogging isn&#039;t exactly an activity made for an iterative approach? What&#039;s written is written and tomorrow is another day...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is of cause where your motivation lies. Everyone hasn&#8217;t got a goal to reach and please the biggest audience possible. If you&#8217;re making a commercial product you probably want to do that, but not necessarily if you&#8217;re at an amateur level. While I think your approach is very interesting in my professional role (being into PR myself), I deliberately refrain from it while I&#8217;m blogging my heart out at my wow blog just for the fun of it and as a relaxing way of spending my spare time. Yeah, I like the readers to be involved, I love to discuss with them in comments, but no way that I would bother to go back and change my blogposts following the feedback in their comments! I guess blogging isn&#8217;t exactly an activity made for an iterative approach? What&#8217;s written is written and tomorrow is another day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

