<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Valuing Nothing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timhowgego.com/valuing-nothing.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timhowgego.com/valuing-nothing.html</link>
	<description>Thoughts, Ideas, Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 05:56:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo Walsh</title>
		<link>http://timhowgego.com/valuing-nothing.html#comment-1356</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 22:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timhowgego.com/?p=162#comment-1356</guid>
		<description>So, currency as means of exchange will wither away, if in small networks, we retain porous enough edges that some inlet can be established, con-currency of mind without a token. 

Here-to-there raises its head again. To wait for a singularity, deus ex machina is to give up reason, which remains pretty useful. 

Been told that LETS communities tend to die out over time, when enough intensity of relation is established that exchange is done without the need for explicit token of value. Then new people can&#039;t get in, the network fades back rather than reaching out. 

I would say that from There, the question and the answer look like the same thing. How can that that help us Here? Do we gain more by asking than by fishing? 

In the hope that i am making at least some sense,


jo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, currency as means of exchange will wither away, if in small networks, we retain porous enough edges that some inlet can be established, con-currency of mind without a token. </p>
<p>Here-to-there raises its head again. To wait for a singularity, deus ex machina is to give up reason, which remains pretty useful. </p>
<p>Been told that LETS communities tend to die out over time, when enough intensity of relation is established that exchange is done without the need for explicit token of value. Then new people can&#8217;t get in, the network fades back rather than reaching out. </p>
<p>I would say that from There, the question and the answer look like the same thing. How can that that help us Here? Do we gain more by asking than by fishing? </p>
<p>In the hope that i am making at least some sense,</p>
<p>jo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex van Someren&#8217;s Lucky Acorns - Tim Howgego</title>
		<link>http://timhowgego.com/valuing-nothing.html#comment-1289</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex van Someren&#8217;s Lucky Acorns - Tim Howgego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timhowgego.com/?p=162#comment-1289</guid>
		<description>[...] to the van Somerens &#8211; wrote about James Austin&#8217;s 4 kinds of luck. It&#8217;s a theory I&#8217;ve also discussed in the past: Active curiosity, unusual background, and distinct hobbies, are just as relevant to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the van Somerens &#8211; wrote about James Austin&#8217;s 4 kinds of luck. It&#8217;s a theory I&#8217;ve also discussed in the past: Active curiosity, unusual background, and distinct hobbies, are just as relevant to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

